I admit it. I have issues with Mary, which is to say I have
issues with how she has been portrayed, used, even exploited by “the church”
over the millennia. Some of this misuse has been, in my opinion, accidental.
The rest of it has been a convenience for the church to subjugate women.
Obviously, Jesus had to have a mother, and, even more
obviously, his mother would be an important figure in Christianity. We do not
meet Mary very often in Scripture. Luke, that old romantic, gives her a a lot of lines in the birth narrative, including her famous and song-filled visit to
Elizabeth. John has her prompting Jesus’ first miracle at Canaan.
Apart from
that, she appears at the Temple where Simeon sings his great nunc dimitus
and warns her of her coming sorrow. She is dismissed rather harshly by the pre-pubescent
Jesus for worrying about his whereabouts. Then she is referred to
parenthetically when Jesus makes his “Nazareth Manifesto” as N.T. Wright calls
it, claiming that only those who do the will of God are his family. Then, of
course, the faithful Mary appears at the cross watching her child be tortured
to death.
From these brief appearances we derive the doctrine that she
was a virgin (her whole life long if you ask Roman Catholics), sinless, mild,
patient, faithful, and sorrowful. But then she is transformed into the
glorified queen of heaven. We presume this glory and the sinlessness that
prompts it from her role as the mother of God. There is something about Jesus’
having been made from her flesh that seems to require that Mary be a perfect
human lest he be touched by or made from imperfection.
Her passive role in Scripture makes this conclusion easy.
She does not quarrel as Peter does, she does
not doubt as does Thomas and she does not jockey for position as do James
and John, nor does she grouse about work in the manner of Martha. The
conclusion is that she is pure and sinless, preternaturally perfect.
To me this line of thought smacks of magical thinking. Theologians
can talk themselves into all kinds of corners and, with Mary, I think they have
tied their own hands and have muddled the thinking of generations of
Christians, especially Christian women.
We can posit that Mary was the ideal mother because Jesus
turned out so well. James, too if you’re Protestant, was exemplary, but her
other children may or may not have been. Her marriage with Joseph was
wonderful, we assume. But the fact is we just don’t know.
Partly because of the meager attention she receives in
Scripture and even more because the church has forced this ideal of sinless
virginity and human perfection on her, we can never know the real Mary.
Except that we can.
Except that we can.
We know what marriage is. We know what giving birth and
raising children is like. We know the dailiness of Mary’s life better than
those Church fathers want to admit. I believe that their raising her up into
glory was a means of dehumanizing her for the purpose of holding up an ideal of
female perfection.
We know what it’s like to be young, alone, in trouble; we
know what it is to be afraid, to love a spouse, to love a child and to lose the
ones you love. Mary is the girl in the juvenile detention center who doesn't know what’s going to happen to her. She’s the girl in love with the football
hero, the mother with the stroller and all the parcels spilling out of it. She’s the woman in the
ER waiting to hear why her child can’t move her head. She’s me watching my son
leave home. She’s me arguing with my daughter about smoking. She’s anyone of us
watching our spouses grow old and weaken.
When I was a little girl growing up in the Church of Rome, I
loved Mary. She was pretty, dressed in a lovely robe, approachable. I fancied
she heard every word I said. Then suddenly, around 8th grade, she faded away. I
knew I would disappoint her because I was not her kind of girl any more. Now
I’m working my way back. We both love the same man, after all.
I invite you, reader, to make your way back to her
acquaintance, too. She is as she has always been, a full-fledged human being
given an extraordinary task which she, being full of grace, was just about equal to. She
is our sister, our neighbor, our friend, maybe even our priest. We don’t need
the church to define Mary. What there is in the New Testament is enough. Read
those passages deeply. The Almighty has done great things to her. “They have no
wine” she says.
Thanks for sharing this lovely, heartfelt reflection. A blessed Advent to you.
ReplyDeleteAnd to you. Thank you so much.
DeleteI'm glad you liked it. Means a lot to me. Thanks for sharing it.
ReplyDelete